Dushanbe’s door-to-door policy is part of an almost decade-long campaign to counter radicalization and religious extremism in the country. Is it effective?
By Abaigeal Lorge December 04, 2024 Credit:
At the beginning of October,
What do these door-to-door visits entail, and are they an effective way to counter radicalization?
Since the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan in 2021, there has been mounting concern about the rise and spread of Islamic extremism across Central Asia, particularly in Tajikistan and Turkmenistan, which both share a long border with Afghanistan. Dushanbe has put measures in place to
In the first half of 2024, door-to-door groups visited over 620,000 homes in the Khatlon region. During these visits, people are asked about friends and relatives living abroad who might be more susceptible to extremist influence; younger individuals are urged to join the army. Officials also warn about online groups and social media as forms of recruitment: embracing the so-called “media jihad,” ISKP uses propaganda
Door-to-door officials also advocate
While visits feel like interrogations and lectures about conforming to Tajik identity, people whose homes were visited said that talks were mainly about how to prevent radicalization, especially in younger individuals.
Critics who view the policy with skepticism say it does little to address the root causes of radicalization.
Another issue with Dushanbe’s policy is that it might be counterproductive: door-to-door visits that target physical appearance and advertise a Tajik “way of being” risks fueling
Dushanbe’s door-to-door policy is part of an almost decade-long campaign to counter radicalization. But only warning people about this issue will not make it go away. While the door-to-door policy may raise awareness about radicalization, and educate some citizens about violent extremist movements, it does not address the more fundamental domestic problems like systemic poverty and restricted religious freedom. Without tackling the root causes of radicalization these kinds of initiatives are unlikely to achieve meaningful or sustainable outcomes to prevent religious extremism.